1.1 Assemble tools, methodologies into unified “user-friendly” package that can be readily utilized by other users.
1.2 Training of research, extension and development agencies and other stakeholders in using the approach and developing community development plans.
1.3 Agroecological characterization, using GIS and other tools, to guide out-scaling of the TIPOs to similar agroecologies. |
Package of published guidelines and other media for implementing the community approach
Research, extension and development agencies and other stakeholders using the approach to develop community development plans in other projects and programmes.
Recommendation domains for TIPOs |
Programme reports |
Assumptions (all activities) :
Policy makers, development agencies and communities are fully collaborating with the programme
Conductive institutional environment for active participation of community members, NGOs, the private sector and other stakeholders, in implementing CDPs
Risks (all activities) :
Unusual drought duration in the programme area |
2.1 National programs assist communities in implementing CDPs
2.2 Programme monitors implementation of CDPs and any emerging constraints or unforeseen problems that arise in their implementation
2.3 Targeted applied and adaptive research to address constraints
2.4 Identify national policy and institutional support or reforms to enable adoption of CDPs and TIPOs. |
Lessons learned from implementing CDPs, including identified constraints to implementing CDPs and / or adopting TIPOs.
New TIPOs identified to address constraints.
Necessary policy and institutional support identified. |
Programme reports Baseline survey Stakeholders reports and meetings minutes Technical Advisory Notes (TANs) |
|
3.1 Compile typology of current practices and institutions involved in management of rangelands.
3.2 Analyze the effects of these practices and managing institutions on rangeland productivity and degradation.
3.3 Review existing and past interventions and projects in rangeland management, and identify factors that contributed to their success or failure.
3.4 Identify and characterize constraints to and opportunities for collective action in managing communal rangelands.
3.5 Determine the best TIPOs and / or incentive structures for sustainable communal rangeland management. |
Current management of rangeland resources characterized
Rangeland productivity under different management structures measured
Constraints limiting the capacity of communities to manage rangeland resources sustainably identified
Technical, institutional and policy options for the sustainable communal management of rangeland resources identified and tested in target communities. |
Data bases
Surveys
Literature reviews
Field results
TANs
Programme reports |
|
