| Narrative Summary |
Objectively Verifiable Indicators |
Means of Verification |
Assumptions and Risks |
| OUTPUTS |
1. A consolidated and documented community approach and identified technical, institutional, and policy options (TIPOs) for use in national development strategies and projects. |
Published package of tools, methodologies and practices for implementing the community approach
Research and extension staff, community leaders, NGOs and development projects trained in community approaches in each country
Guidelines for the use of the TIPOs are developed and published
Development projects are using proposed community approaches and TIPOs |
Publications and other media disseminating the community approach and recommended TIPOs
Technical advisory notes for TIPOs
Training manuals, programs and evaluation reports
Development project reports |
Research on emerging issues and constraints is ongoing
National project staff remain in position to maintain continuity
Governments allocate funds to research and extension services for institutionalizing the approach |
CDPs implemented in target communities |
Number of successfully implemented CDPs
Number and extent of TIPOS adopted by communities
Extent of investment (monetary and in-kind) by communities in the implementation of their CDPs |
National project reports
Reports from community monitoring and evaluation studies
Reports from community meetings |
Community members and institutions are willing to participate in implementing their CDPs
National Ministries and development agencies support the implementation and necessary investments in CDPs. |
Evaluation of factors that hinder collective action and successful implementation of technical and institutional innovations in communal rangeland management and recommendations for institutional and policy measures to promote communal rangeland management. |
Typology of different interventions in rangeland management
Identified factors that contribute to success or failure of interventions (constraints and incentives)
Published guidelines for promoting collective action
Communal rangeland management practices successfully implemented by target communities
Rangeland development projects using proposed options |
Workshops between policy makers, communities, researchers and other stakeholders
Published policy, institutional and public management options for the communal rangelands
National programme reports
Reports from community monitoring and evaluation studies
Reports from community meetings |
National governments implement institutional and policy measures to promote communal rangeland management.
Communities are willing and capable of cooperating in communal management
Development agencies are willing to support and integrate proposed options in their rangeland projects |
